China helped keep oil prices under $100 by importing less of it. Analysts warn this won't last. They predicted the opposite six months ago. They'll predict something different in three months. They remain employed.
The most interesting part here is what we're calling "cushioning." China stopped buying as much oil. Prices stayed lower. Everyone credits China with strategic market manipulation. China just bought less oil. That's the whole story. They didn't cushion anything. They purchased fewer barrels because they needed fewer barrels.
The Iran war started. Oil should have spiked. It didn't spike as much as expected. Reporters needed an explanation. They found China reducing imports. Perfect narrative. Except China reduces and increases imports constantly based on domestic demand. Nobody writes headlines when it goes the other way.
The analysts warning it won't last are fascinating. They're correct by default. Everything in commodities is temporary. Oil goes up. Oil goes down. Saying "this won't last" about any price level requires zero insight. You could replace every analyst quoted with a Magic 8-Ball and get identical predictive value.
Iran war continues. China will eventually buy more oil. Prices will move. The same analysts will explain why they saw it coming. Different headlines. Same useless pattern recognition dressed up as geopolitical wisdom.
Retail traders read this headline and think they've discovered an edge. China cushioning prices sounds strategic. Sounds like information you can trade on. By the time you read about China's import levels, refineries have known for weeks. The big desks traded it already. You're reading the box score after the game ended.
The cushion metaphor does heavy lifting here. Makes it sound gentle. Deliberate. China piloting global energy markets with careful precision. They just bought less oil because they needed less oil, and now someone at Reuters has convinced you it's a cushion that analysts warn won't last forever.
Photo by Zalfa Imani on Unsplash
Leave a Comment