Chip stocks just closed their best first half and quarter on record. Historic performance. Unprecedented gains. And now financial journalists want to tell you what to do about it.
The advice arrives six months late. The move already happened. The gains are banked. By someone else.
This is like getting directions to a party at 3am when everyone's already gone home and someone's vacuuming. But sure, let's discuss what investors should do now.
Here's what technical analysis says: absolutely nothing useful about a headline announcing historical performance that already occurred. The best quarter is over. It closed. Past tense. The only thing left to analyze is how many people will read "best first-half on record" and decide that's their cue to go all-in.
Retail traders see record performance and think it's a starting gun. It's not. It's a finish line. You're staring at the scoreboard after the game ended, wondering if you should buy a jersey.
The beautiful part is the phrasing. "What investors should do now." Not what they should have done six months ago when this historic run started. Now. After it became historic. After it closed. After every fund manager already took their victory lap.
Chipmakers had their best performance ever, and the only question that matters is how many people will mistake a victory lap for a warm-up.
Technical analysis doesn't care about record quarters. It cares about what happens next. And what happens next is a lot of people buying because they read the word "historic" and confused it with "early."
The chips rallied. Someone made a fortune. That someone was not reading articles asking what investors should do now.
Photo by Tech Daily on Unsplash
Leave a Comment