Jim Cramer told people to buy Intel after it climbed more than 200% this year. Brilliant timing. Really nailed the entry point on that one.
The stock went up. Then Cramer said buy it. This is the equivalent of recommending an umbrella after someone's already soaking wet, except the umbrella costs seventy billion dollars and manufactures semiconductors.
He wants investors to focus on Intel's future AI opportunities. Not the present ones. Not the past ones. The future ones that exist in a dimension where Intel hasn't been getting its ass handed to it by every other chipmaker for the last decade. Those opportunities.
Here's what happened: a stock moved. Financial media needed content. Cramer filled airtime. Retail traders saw the segment, checked their brokerage apps, realized they missed the entire f*cking move, and bought anyway because a man on television used the words "AI opportunities" in a sentence.
The technical setup doesn't care that Cramer likes Intel. The chart doesn't watch CNBC. Support and resistance levels aren't formed by Mad Money segments. They're formed by where people actually bought and sold, which in Intel's case was 200% lower than where Cramer decided to share his wisdom.
Imagine being the guy who sees a stock triple, hears it's still a buy, and thinks "finally, my moment." That guy is about to learn what a pullback feels like. He'll blame the market. He'll blame algorithms. He'll never blame the bald man who told him to chase a parabolic move because AI exists.
Intel might keep going up. It might crash tomorrow. Neither outcome will have anything to do with what Jim Cramer said on television, but one of those outcomes will definitely leave someone holding bags they bought at the top because they confused stock tips with strategy.
Photo by on Unsplash
Leave a Comment