Kalshi launched a product called Pro. It lets users trade multiple markets at once. The company built this because their most active traders kept running into problems. Problems that exist because Kalshi designed the original platform.
This is the business model. Create friction. Wait for customers to complain. Rebrand the solution as innovation. Charge them for it or collect the PR.
The memo went to CNBC. Not to users. CNBC gets the memo about how Kalshi listened to feedback and built something better. The traders who suffered through the old system get perpetual futures and the privilege of being called early adopters instead of beta testers.
Perpetual futures showed up too. Those contracts that never expire. The financial equivalent of a gym membership you can't cancel because you never signed up for a term. Just keeps going. Just keeps extracting.
Active traders love this stuff. They think speed matters. They think trading five markets simultaneously makes them sophisticated. It makes them busy. Busy is not the same as right. Busy is just expensive.
The platform alleviates problems. That's the word they used. Alleviates. Not solves. Not fixes. Alleviates. Like ibuprofen for a headache you gave yourself by staring at prediction markets for eight hours.
Kalshi could have built Pro first. They didn't. They built the worse version, let people use it, gathered data on what sucked, then built the thing they should have built initially. This is called product development. It used to be called incompetence.
Now the most active traders get tools that work. Everyone else gets the old platform and the knowledge that better exists but isn't for them yet. That's not a product launch. That's a f*cking hostage negotiation.
Photo by on Unsplash
Leave a Comment