Oklahoma ran a program called SEED OK. Gave some newborns a grand. Researchers studied what happened. Discovered the money affected the kids somehow. Probably in ways that will definitely replicate at scale and definitely won't vanish the second you try to turn a pilot program into national policy.
The state handed out $1,000 to babies who couldn't even hold their own heads up. These children did not ask for investment accounts. They asked for milk and dry diapers. Oklahoma said here's a tax-deferred vehicle instead. The babies could not object because they had not yet developed object permanence.
Now we have Trump Accounts. Same concept. Different branding. Give kids money early and maybe they'll grow up financially literate instead of buying options on leveraged ETFs they learned about from a guy named CryptoKing88 on Twitter. SEED OK paved the way for this. We are calling a thousand-dollar handout infrastructure now.
The researchers say the grants affected the kids. Affected how? The article does not specify. Could mean anything. Could mean the kids checked their account balance twice. Could mean they understood compound interest. Could mean their parents cashed out early and bought a jet ski. All of these qualify as effects.
Retail traders will read this headline and think it's bullish for something. Fisher-Price maybe. Gerber. Companies that make those plastic keys babies chew on. They will not read the actual research. They will see newborns and money in the same sentence and assume it's a signal. By Monday they'll have convinced themselves this is why small-cap value is about to rip.
The real lesson from SEED OK is that you can study anything if you frame it as longitudinal research and someone else pays for it. Give babies money. Wait fifteen years. Publish findings. Claim causation. Watch policymakers nod thoughtfully and scale your pilot into a national program that will absolutely eat sh*t the moment it leaves Oklahoma.
Photo by on Unsplash
Leave a Comment