Trump walked out of an interview. This is news now. Walking. Out of a room. The same action toddlers perform when denied dessert has become a headline-worthy event.
The president discussed election fraud claims. He got challenged. He left. Three events occurred in sequence. A reporter witnessed bipedal locomotion toward an exit. Stop the presses.
He also mentioned something called a weaponization fund. The fund would proceed despite setbacks, he said. What setbacks? Doesn't matter. What weaponization? Who cares. The fund exists in the same conceptual space as your retirement account: theoretically real but functionally imaginary.
The interviewer challenged him. That's the verb they used. Challenged. As if journalism is a duel. As if asking a follow-up question requires a gauntlet and seconds. The interviewer probably felt very brave. Very Edward R. Murrow. Very truth-to-power.
Then Trump left the room. He used his legs. He moved through space. He crossed a threshold. This is what passes for drama.
The market didn't react because nothing happened. A man spoke words, heard different words, then relocated his body to a different room. Your portfolio remains unchanged. Your trading strategy remains terrible. The S&P 500 continued its path with the same indifference it shows to every presidential verb.
The weaponization fund will proceed. Or it won't. Setbacks exist. Or they don't. Trump wants something. The interviewer wanted answers. Neither got what they wanted. One got an empty chair. The other got a hallway.
You read about this because you believe it matters for your positions, which is adorable in the way a child's drawing of a house is adorable: technically represents something real but utterly useless as architecture.
Photo by on Unsplash
Leave a Comment