Iran and the United States traded strikes near the Strait of Hormuz. Markets barely moved. The VIX ticked up half a point. Someone on Reddit bought puts on oil tanker ETFs three days too late.
Twenty percent of the world's oil passes through that strait. Actual shooting started between two countries with actual militaries. Retail traders checked their portfolios, saw their tech stocks down 0.3%, and blamed the Fed.
American military bases in Gulf states took incoming fire. Iran responded to U.S. strikes by launching attacks on installations housing American troops. The conflict escalated from posturing to live ammunition. A day trader in Michigan panic-sold his energy calls because someone on Twitter said geopolitical risk was "probably priced in."
Here's what matters for technical analysis: none of this. The 50-day moving average doesn't care about missiles. The RSI doesn't factor in regional instability. Your Fibonacci retracement levels won't adjust because two nations decided to shoot at each other near the world's most critical oil chokepoint.
Somewhere right now a guy is drawing trend lines on a crude oil chart. He's convinced his pattern recognition will predict what happens when the strait closes. He's using MACD crossovers to time his entry. He thinks his stop-loss will protect him when tankers stop moving and gas hits $7 a gallon.
The Strait of Hormuz could shut down tomorrow. Oil could double. None of that will show up in your bullish divergence. Your cup-and-handle pattern won't survive a supply shock. But sure, keep watching those Bollinger Bands while two countries with actual weapons solve their differences the old-fashioned way.
The U.S. military and Iran just turned a waterway into a shooting gallery, and retail traders are still trying to scalp 0.5% on leveraged ETFs before lunch.
Photo by on Unsplash
Leave a Comment