Bank of America announced that stocks might get hurt when the 10-year yield hits 7%. They studied history. They crunched numbers. They arrived at a figure so perfectly useless that it deserves its own press release.
The 10-year yield sits around 4.5% right now. So we need another 250 basis points before anyone should worry. That gives retail traders roughly two and a half years of buying every dip with money they don't have before reality arrives. Plenty of time to lose it all on leveraged ETFs.
History suggests 7% is the magic number. History also suggested that housing prices never go down and that Bear Stearns was fine. But sure, let's trust history. Let's build our entire investment thesis around a backward-looking study that assumes the next crisis will politely wait until we hit a round number before destroying portfolios.
The beauty of picking 7% is that Bank of America gets to be right no matter what happens. If yields never reach 7% and stocks crater anyway, they'll issue a new report explaining how this time was different. If yields hit 7% and stocks keep climbing, they'll mention the lag effect. If yields hit 7% and stocks collapse, they'll frame the research deck and hang it in the lobby.
Meanwhile some guy named Derek just read this headline and decided to set a price alert for the 10-year at 6.9%. He'll get the notification. He'll panic-sell his entire portfolio. The yield will reverse the next day. Derek will buy back in at the top. The cycle continues.
The 10-year yield will hurt stocks when it hurts stocks, which is to say whenever the market decides that interest rates matter again, which could be at 5% or 8% or never, depending on how many acronyms the Fed invents to postpone the problem. But 7% sounds scientific enough to get quoted in client meetings, and that's what really matters.
Photo by Tech Daily on Unsplash
Leave a Comment