The FAA delayed certification of the Boeing 737 Max 10 because of a software issue. Not a hardware issue. Not a structural issue. Software. The thing every other industry fixes with a patch on Tuesday morning.
Boeing has been working on Max 10 certification since 2017. That's nine years to get the code right. Your nephew learned Python in three months and built an app that tells you if a hot dog is a sandwich. Boeing had nearly a decade and couldn't debug whatever subroutine tells the plane not to do the bad thing.
The Max 7 and Max 8 already flew into the side of this PR disaster. Two crashes. Hundreds dead. A global grounding that cost the company roughly $20 billion. The fix was supposed to be foolproof. Layers of redundancy. New training requirements. A commitment to safety that would make a crossing guard weep.
Now the Max 10 sits in regulatory purgatory because someone at Boeing apparently commented out the wrong line of code. The FAA administrator said they need to assess the issue. Assess. That's the word you use when you're not sure if the thing will fall out of the sky but you're too polite to say it on camera.
Retail traders saw this headline and immediately checked if they could buy Boeing call options on margin. They figured delayed certification means more time to price in the good news. They confused a software failure with a buying opportunity. They treat federal aviation safety holds like limited-time discounts at a going-out-of-business sale.
The Max 10 will eventually get certified. Boeing will issue a statement about their commitment to excellence. Airlines will take delivery. Passengers will board without knowing which version of the Max they're sitting in. And somewhere in Seattle, a project manager will update the timeline for the fourteenth time this quarter, confident that the next deadline will definitely be the one they hit.
Photo by on Unsplash
Leave a Comment