The United States and China have agreed to lower tariffs on $60 billion worth of goods. Sports equipment made the list. So did toys. And Christmas decorations.
Christmas decorations.
Two nuclear superpowers sat across from each other and hammered out the geopolitical status of inflatable Santas. Somewhere in a conference room, a trade representative with three graduate degrees argued about the tariff rate on plastic reindeer. His counterpart took notes. They broke for lunch. They came back and kept going.
The technical setup on ornamental bells remains bullish regardless of tariff policy. The 50-day moving average on lawn inflatables has nothing to do with whether Beijing charges 15% or 8%. Your neighbor who bought toy stocks because he read this headline will lose money in a way completely unrelated to trade policy.
Farm products appeared on China's import list. Which farm products? Doesn't say. Could be soybeans. Could be corn. Could be decorative gourds for all the specificity provided. But some guy in Iowa just texted his broker about agriculture ETFs because he skimmed three sentences and felt informed.
The S&P 500 will do what it was going to do anyway. Traders will pretend this matters. They'll draw lines on charts and cite the Christmas decoration accord as a catalyst. They'll say the toy tariff reduction confirms their thesis. Their thesis is wrong but not because of this.
Sports equipment gets cheaper to import now. Basketballs. Tennis rackets. Ping pong paddles. The kind of products that move in predictable seasonal patterns that have nothing to do with diplomatic breakthroughs but everything to do with the fact that people buy sporting goods in spring and ignore them in November.
Two countries just negotiated the price of plastic garbage and called it diplomacy, and somewhere a retail trader is calculating his position size on the news.
Photo by on Unsplash
Leave a Comment