The Chicago Mercantile Exchange partnered with Silicon Data to launch futures contracts for AI computing power. October 5th is the date. Regulatory review pending, which means a bunch of people in suits will pretend to understand what a GPU cluster is before rubber-stamping this.
Computing power joins the ranks of pork bellies and frozen orange juice as things you can bet on without ever touching. The difference is you understood what a pig was. You have no f*cking clue what a teraflop is. Neither does your broker.
Two separate contracts will trade. One for immediate delivery of compute. One for future delivery of compute. Both are cash-settled because the CME learned from the oil futures disaster that actually delivering the underlying asset creates paperwork.
Silicon Data provides the benchmark pricing. They measure computing capacity across data centers and spit out a number. That number becomes the settlement price. You're now trading a derivative based on an index calculated by a company most people learned existed today. Sleep well.
Retail traders will buy these thinking they're getting exposure to AI. They're not. They're getting exposure to data center utilization rates and whatever methodology Silicon Data uses to weight their index. Good luck explaining that loss to your spouse.
The pitch writes itself. Diversify your portfolio with non-correlated assets. Add alternative exposure. Hedge your technology risk. What you're actually doing is paying transaction fees to speculate on whether nerds in Palo Alto can rent out their server farms.
Institutional demand drove this product launch. Some hedge fund convinced the CME there's enough interest to justify the infrastructure build. They'll trade it for six months before liquidity dries up and it joins the graveyard of failed futures contracts nobody remembers.
The future of finance is renting someone else's math homework by the hour and calling it an asset class.
Photo by on Unsplash
Leave a Comment