A freight fund traded crude oil tanker futures during a U.S.-Iran war and made 3,600%. Not 36%. Not 360%. Three thousand six hundred percent. The kind of return that makes you wonder if the fund manager was trading or just held down the buy button during a seizure.
Oil prices surged. Freight costs exploded. Tariffs made shipping expensive. But crude tankers? Crude tankers went parabolic in a way that suggests the entire global supply chain decided to route through the Suez Canal backward while on fire.
Every other shipping trade posted normal war-premium gains. Dry bulk did fine. Container ships made money. Crude tanker futures went vertical like someone discovered the underlying asset was actually cocaine.
The technical setup was clean. War breaks out. Oil spikes. Tankers move oil. Futures go up. A child could have drawn the chart in crayon and arrived at the same conclusion. But retail traders were busy buying tech stocks during a war because CNBC told them innovation doesn't stop for geopolitical conflict.
Somewhere right now a guy who bought Tesla calls the day Iran launched missiles is explaining to his wife that the 3,600% gain in crude tanker futures was "impossible to predict." He will use the word black swan. He will mention algo traders. He will not mention that he spent four hours researching which AI startup would cure cancer instead of looking at a shipping chart for eleven seconds.
The fund bought tanker futures. War happened. Tankers became the only way to move oil without getting blown up. The fund sold. This is not genius. This is reading.
Retail bought the dip on growth stocks and learned that boats matter more than apps when the boats are dodging missiles.
Photo by on Unsplash
Leave a Comment