Two studies looked at the same wealth transfer. One said $100 trillion. The other said $36 trillion. The difference is $64 trillion.
That's not a rounding error. That's not a margin of interpretation. That's the GDP of the entire planet forgetting to carry the one.
Retail traders will read both studies. They'll split the difference in their heads. They'll invest based on $68 trillion. They'll tell their families at Thanksgiving that boomers are about to hand down generational wealth and they're positioned perfectly to capitalize on the transfer through a diversified portfolio of meme stocks and leveraged ETFs they don't understand.
The studies can't agree because nobody knows who owns what or when they'll die or whether the kids will get it or the government will take it or if it'll all get donated to a cat sanctuary in Vermont. But someone published a white paper with a number that has twelve zeroes so now it's financial news.
Here's what matters for your chart: none of this. Price action doesn't care if the transfer is $100 trillion or $36 trillion or eleven dollars. Support and resistance don't move because someone's grandfather might leave them a Schwab account in 2041.
The wealth transfer could be zero. Every boomer could spend their last dollar on the day they die buying scratchers at a gas station. Your trendlines would look exactly the same.
But sure, keep refreshing your portfolio thinking about money that doesn't exist yet going to people who aren't you based on estimates that vary by the size of China.
Photo by Morgan Housel on Unsplash
Leave a Comment