The Federal Reserve might raise rates. Or keep them high. Or lower them. Nobody knows. Financial journalists have turned this into a reason to recommend short-term fixed income products.
Short-term bonds pay you to wait while pretending you have a strategy. You don't have a strategy. You have a portfolio of stuff that expires before your thesis gets disproven.
Higher-for-longer used to be a warning. Now it's a marketing slogan. Some analyst at a midsize wealth management firm looked at a yield curve and decided uncertainty equals opportunity. That analyst has never been uncertain about anything except which corporate talking points to plagiarize first.
The article suggests tweaking your portfolio. Tweaking. Like you're adjusting a carburetor. You're being told to rearrange deck chairs because the ocean might get choppier but also might not. The Fed hasn't committed to a damn thing and probably won't until the data forces their hand. But sure, let's call that an opportunity.
Retail traders will read this and immediately Google "best short-term bond ETFs." They'll find sixteen identical funds with expense ratios that differ by three basis points. They'll spend four hours researching the difference. They'll pick one. Six months later the Fed will do the opposite of whatever higher-for-longer implied and the traders will wonder why their safe play returned less than a checking account.
The prospect of higher-for-longer is starting to look like more of a sure thing. That's the actual quote. Starting to look like more of a sure thing. Not a sure thing. More of one. Than before. When it was less of one.
If you need rate certainty to invest in fixed income, you shouldn't be investing in fixed income.
Photo by Infrarate.com on Unsplash
Leave a Comment