The International Energy Agency just figured out that when oil gets expensive people use less of it. Revolutionary stuff. Took them an entire war to connect those dots.
Iran starts a conflict. Oil supply gets tight. Prices spike. Consumers worldwide look at the pump and decide maybe they don't need to drive to Target three times a day. The IEA calls this "demand destruction" like they're describing a natural disaster instead of basic f*cking economics.
Here's the timeline. Supply shock happens. Everyone panics. Oil futures rip higher. Then actual humans with actual budgets stop buying as much oil because it costs more. Demand falls. Supply loosens. Now we've got a glut. The IEA slashes its forecast and acts like this required advanced modeling instead of a calculator from 1987.
Retail traders spent three weeks buying USO calls at the top because some guy on Twitter said oil was going to two hundred dollars a barrel. They learned what contango means the hard way. Then they learned what margin calls feel like. Then they learned their Robinhood account could go negative.
The best part is calling it a glut. We went from supply shock to oil glut in the time it takes most people to finish a Netflix series. The entire commodity supercycle got compressed into one news cycle. Iran's still fighting. The supply situation hasn't fundamentally changed. But demand collapsed faster than anyone modeled because the IEA forgot that high prices make people poor and poor people use less energy.
Technical analysts saw none of this coming because we don't pretend to predict geopolitical events or macroeconomic demand curves. We just draw lines and wait for price to do something. The lines didn't care about Iran. They still don't. But sure, keep reading IEA forecasts like they're carved in stone instead of vibes with footnotes.
Photo by on Unsplash
Leave a Comment