Russia bombed Kyiv. Ukraine bombed back. A NATO military chief held a press conference to announce that invading the Baltics would be expensive for Moscow. Groundbreaking stuff.
The general's warning carries the full weight of a threat your mom made when you were twelve. "You'll lose a lot if you do that." What's next, telling Putin he'll be grounded? Maybe lose his Xbox privileges?
Retail traders saw "strain on oil supplies" and immediately began googling which ETF tracks Baltic defense contractors. They found seven different tickers. Bought all of them. Four were already delisted. Two were cryptocurrency scams. One was a company that makes office furniture in Tampa.
The heaviest strikes in months happened and oil moved three percent. Somewhere a day trader named Brandon sold his XLE calls at a loss because he panic-read a headline about OPEC production schedules from 2019. He now believes geopolitical risk is priced in. It is not priced in. Brandon also does not know what priced in means.
NATO warns Moscow about hypothetical invasions while actual bombs fall on actual cities. This is the equivalent of a lifeguard yelling "Don't run" at kids already drowning. But sure, the Baltics are the real concern here. Strategically vital analysis.
The chart doesn't care about NATO press conferences. The chart doesn't care about escalation fears. The chart doesn't even know where the Baltics are. The chart printed a bearish engulfing candle on the daily and retail still bought the dip because some verified account on Twitter said this was Sarajevo 1914. It was not Sarajevo 1914. It was a Wednesday.
Meanwhile Brandon's portfolio is down forty-two percent and he's telling his wife it's unrealized losses so technically it doesn't count.
Photo by on Unsplash
Leave a Comment