Cisco stock dropped 5% because an analyst at Piper Sandler decided growth might be peaking. Not has peaked. Not is peaking. Might be peaking. The stock hit a record over the summer and now some guy with a spreadsheet thinks the good times could possibly be slowing down at some point in the future maybe.
This is what passes for analysis. A price target gets cut and retail traders panic-sell like someone yelled fire in a theater. Except there's no fire. There's just a research note suggesting that a company selling routers and switches might not grow forever at the exact same rate. F*cking groundbreaking stuff.
The stock hit a record high mere months ago. Everything was fine. The company was doing whatever Cisco does. Then Piper Sandler expresses concerns about industry growth peaking and suddenly 5% of the market cap evaporates. Not because revenue collapsed. Not because the CEO got caught running a Ponzi scheme. Because growth concerns.
Every retail trader who bought at the summer high is now staring at their Robinhood app wondering what growth peaking even means. They'll Google it. They'll read three paragraphs of a Motley Fool article. They'll convince themselves they understand cyclical tech infrastructure markets. Then they'll panic-sell at a loss and blame the analysts.
The chart didn't change. The moving averages didn't suddenly start pointing down because some analyst updated his Excel model. Cisco is the same company it was yesterday. But the price target got cut so everyone pretends the thesis just shifted.
Piper Sandler will be wrong or right and nobody will remember either way because six months from now there'll be a new price target based on completely different concerns and the cycle will repeat forever until the sun explodes.
Photo by on Unsplash
Leave a Comment