Saudi Arabia intercepted two ballistic missiles fired from Yemen by Houthi militants who apparently forgot that picking fights with your wealthier neighbors rarely ends well. The Iran-backed group had been attacking Red Sea shipping lanes because when you can't afford a navy, you improvise.
Greek security sources confirmed the interceptions to Reuters. Greeks watching Middle Eastern missile exchanges. That's like asking a vegan to referee a barbecue competition.
The Saudis responded with airstrikes on Houthi targets because intercepting missiles is expensive and someone needs to discourage future invoices. This marks an escalation in what Reuters calls "a second front in the Iran war," which is marketing speak for "the first front went so well they opened a franchise."
Retail traders immediately began scanning their portfolios for Red Sea shipping exposure. They found three ETFs they don't understand and a maritime stock they bought in 2023 because the ticker symbol spelled a word. None of them checked where the Suez Canal is located. Half of them think Yemen is a cryptocurrency.
The Houthis have been targeting commercial vessels in the Red Sea for months, turning one of the world's busiest shipping lanes into a game of maritime whack-a-mole. Insurers raised premiums. Shipping companies rerouted. Some guy in Connecticut who day-trades oil futures during his lunch break convinced himself he predicted all of this.
Iran backs the Houthis with weapons and training. Saudi Arabia backs their own military with American hardware and a defense budget larger than Yemen's entire GDP. This is what experts call asymmetric warfare. It's what everyone else calls bringing a ballistic missile to a GDP fight.
The missiles were intercepted before reaching Saudi territory, which means the Houthis are now zero-for-two on their latest launch attempts and presumably shopping for better rocket scientists on LinkedIn.
Photo by on Unsplash
Leave a Comment