Saudi Aramco posted a 33% profit jump in Q2 because Iran decided to get into a war that choked oil supply. The company did nothing different. Didn't innovate. Didn't restructure. Didn't launch a new product line. Just sat there pumping oil while geopolitical chaos turned their balance sheet into a slot machine that only pays out.
Oil supermajors across the board reported blowout profits for the same reason. Higher fossil fuel prices. Not because they earned it. Because someone else lit the match and they happened to be holding the gas can. This is what passes for corporate strategy now. Wait for a war. Watch the ticker go up. Cash the check.
Retail traders saw this headline and immediately started googling "how to buy Aramco stock" without realizing the Saudi government owns 98% of it and they're not exactly handing out shares to Doug from Kansas City who thinks he cracked the code after watching three YouTube videos about oil futures.
The technical analysis here is simple. Draw a line on the chart. Label it "war started here." Draw another line going up. Label it "profits." Congratulations, you've now performed the same level of analysis as every energy sector analyst who will call this a "strong quarter driven by favorable market conditions." Favorable. That's the word we use now when people are dying and your stock goes up.
Saudi Aramco didn't do a goddamn thing to earn this. They were just there. The oil equivalent of being born on third base and thinking you hit a triple. Except in this case third base is a active war zone and the triple is blood money with a 33% return.
Check the charts if you want. The correlation between regional instability and energy profits is so tight you could use it to teach statistics. Or morality. But we stopped teaching that one.
Photo by on Unsplash
Leave a Comment