Dario Amodei proposed an AI slowdown. Sam Altman welcomed it. Demis Hassabis welcomed it. Elon Musk welcomed it. Four men who run companies racing to build the most powerful AI systems on Earth all agreed that maybe everyone should pump the brakes a little.
Except China.
Amodei calls China the "toughest dilemma" for his slowdown idea. Translation: his plan works great as long as the second-largest economy in the world and America's primary technological rival also agrees to stop doing the thing that gives them geopolitical leverage. So it doesn't work at all.
This is the billionaire version of suggesting everyone at the poker table should agree to only bet small. Sounds noble. Requires your opponents to be f*cking idiots.
The proposal is essentially a cartel without enforcement mechanisms. Altman gets to look thoughtful. Hassabis gets to seem responsible. Musk gets to pretend he believes in regulatory oversight despite spending his entire career treating regulators like traffic cones. And Amodei gets to frame himself as the moral center of an industry built on the premise that whoever ships AGI first wins everything.
Meanwhile China is not slowing down. They are not worried about AI safety conferences in Aspen. They are not concerned with whether Silicon Valley CEOs can sleep at night. They are building.
So the "toughest dilemma" is that Amodei's proposal requires voluntary cooperation from a nation-state that has zero incentive to cooperate and every incentive to sprint while America takes a water break. Game theory for toddlers.
The four horsemen of the AI apocalypse all agreed to ride slower, which would be touching if any of them meant it and if it mattered at all.
Photo by on Unsplash
Leave a Comment