Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced a deal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz might happen this week. Oil prices immediately tanked. Traders who spent the last month building elaborate positions around supply disruptions watched their portfolios implode in real time.
The Strait of Hormuz carries about 21 million barrels of crude per day. That's roughly a fifth of global oil consumption. Closing it would be catastrophic. Reopening it would be normal. Bessent said freedom of navigation would return. The market interpreted this as revolutionary.
Retail traders had convinced themselves they were geopolitical experts. They studied maps. They read Twitter threads about Iranian naval capabilities. They learned the word "chokepoint" and used it constantly. Then Bessent said a few words and their entire thesis evaporated faster than their account balances.
The technical picture was screaming oversold before the headline dropped. RSI was pinned. Bollinger Bands were stretched. Every oscillator was maxed out. None of it mattered because some guy in Washington said maybe a thing would happen soon.
This is how financial markets work. Fundamental news overrides technical setups every single time until it doesn't. Then technical analysts post charts showing they called it all along by drawing enough lines that one of them eventually intersected with price action.
The Strait of Hormuz has been a geopolitical flashpoint for decades. Bessent solved it with a vague statement about a deal that may or may not happen this week. The word "may" did not stop oil from cratering. Certainty is for cowards. Retail traders trade on vibes and press releases.
Bessent gets to look competent. Oil producers get to panic. Traders who went long on war premium get to explain to their spouses why they're back at Wendy's. Everyone wins except the people who thought headlines were tradeable information.
Photo by on Unsplash
Leave a Comment