Trump told Iran to make a deal or watch its economy collapse. President Pezeshkian responded by boarding a plane to New York for a UN meeting. Somewhere between these two events, a retail trader pulled up a chart of the Iranian rial and wondered if geopolitical brinksmanship shows up as a bullish divergence.
The threat involved destroying Iran's economy or eliminating its leadership. Those are the options. Deal or destruction. Pezeshkian chose option three: attend a meeting at the UN while pretending the former president's social media posts constitute actionable intelligence. Bold strategy.
Retail traders immediately began searching for Iranian ETFs. They found none that weren't already sanctioned into oblivion. Undeterred, they pivoted to oil futures. If Trump destroys Iran's economy, surely Brent crude goes up. If he eliminates the leadership, maybe it goes down first then up. Better buy straddles. Better sell straddles. Better ask Reddit.
The headline says this complicates efforts at diplomacy. Efforts at diplomacy. As if there were efforts. As if anyone involved in this story has demonstrated interest in anything resembling diplomatic resolution. Pezeshkian flies to New York. Trump posts threats. Diplomacy happens in the negative space between these actions like some kind of geopolitical Rorschach test.
Technical analysts will chart this. They will draw lines connecting Trump's last Iran threat to this one. They will identify support at regime change and resistance at nuclear deal. They will publish their findings on Twitter with eighteen indicators overlaid on a screenshot they took with their phone. Someone will ask what timeframe works best for swing trading sanctions.
The President of Iran is heading into a room full of diplomats while the former President of the United States threatens to delete his country from the NASDAQ of nations, and somebody out there is calculating the Fibonacci retracement on Iranian uranium enrichment.
Photo by on Unsplash
Leave a Comment