The VIX moved in the same direction as stocks. Financial media lost its mind. Called it "unusual." Called it a "fear gauge doing something strange." Forgot to mention this happens one out of every five trading days.
Twenty percent of the time. Not rare. Not unprecedented. Not worth a headline. Just math that contradicts the narrative someone needed to file before lunch.
Retail traders saw the story and immediately checked their portfolios. Wondered if they should hedge. Googled "what does VIX mean." Found seventeen conflicting explanations. Bought puts anyway because some guy on Twitter with a laser-eyed profile picture said the market was "looking shaky."
The VIX measures implied volatility on S&P 500 options. It goes up when people buy protection. Sometimes people buy protection when stocks go up because they're worried about giving back gains. Sometimes they buy protection because option spreads widened for reasons that have nothing to do with fear. Sometimes they buy protection because a pension fund in Denmark rebalanced and a market maker needed to hedge gamma exposure across forty-seven different strikes.
None of this is mysterious. None of this requires a think piece. But here we are.
Stocks hit record highs and the fear gauge ticked higher and now everyone's pretending correlation works like a light switch. Up means down. Down means up. If both go up the simulation is broken and we should all buy gold and move to Montana.
The real story is that Wall Street convinced the world that a single derived metric could summarize market sentiment. Then convinced them it was called a "fear gauge" instead of what it actually is, which is a mathematical function of option prices that sounds way less sexy when you explain it correctly.
The unusual part isn't that the VIX moved with stocks. The unusual part is that anyone still thinks reading financial news will help them make money.
Photo by on Unsplash
Leave a Comment