Texas held an election. The AI trade flinched. Both facts are true. Neither one is your edge.
Gov. Greg Abbott spent November 2025 standing next to Google's Sundar Pichai, celebrating a $40 billion investment and calling Texas the "epicenter of AI development." By September he had halted new data center permits. That is a man selling the house while the movers carry in the couch.
His challenger, Democrat Gina Hinojosa, built her ad campaign on data centers. Data centers. The thing your brother-in-law calls "the picks and shovels play."
Analysts at Washington Analysis flagged the race as a pressure point. A Sarah Bianchi note said Abbott was likely to lift the data center moratorium and Hinojosa was expected to keep it. The Global X AI and Technology ETF (AIQ) was already down about 10%, wobbling on worries about financing, valuations and the debt of smaller cloud companies.
So the AI trade was down. Then it got a ballot.
Prediction markets had Abbott at 60% on Kalshi. Hinojosa had 40%, up from 8% in mid-July. You saw that move coming? You did not. You were busy reading a chart upside down.
Then Abbott conceded. Hinojosa won. She is the first Democrat to win the Texas governorship since Ann Richards in 1990. Abbott outspent her by tens of millions of dollars. Money buys a lot of things. Not Texans.
Texas has 335 data centers, with at least 248 more on the way. Hinojosa now governs all of them. Winning the mansion doesn't give her carte blanche, but it does give you a new thing to be wrong about.
CNBC says one election probably can't alter the AI trade over the long term. Good. Hold that thought while you refresh your brokerage app forty times before lunch.
Your AI thesis lost to a woman from Austin and her attack ads, and it still has more dignity than your options position.
Photo by on Unsplash
Leave a Comment