Wall Street analysts published stock ratings on Thursday. SpaceX, Nvidia, Tesla, Intel, Micron, Oracle, Meta, and AMD all received opinions from people whose job is to be wrong with confidence.
The headline lists eight companies. Eight separate tickers. Some analyst woke up Thursday morning and decided today was the day to have thoughts about SpaceX and Meta and f*cking Micron. That's not analysis. That's hoarding.
These calls will move stock prices for approximately ninety seconds. Then the algos will remember that analyst ratings have the predictive power of a coin flip performed by a drunk. Then we're back to charts. Pure price action. The only truth that matters.
Retail traders will see this headline and think it means something. They'll open their Robinhood app and start googling "what does overweight mean" and "is neutral bad" and "how to read analyst report without paying $400." They'll find a summary on Reddit. They'll buy calls based on a screenshot of a tweet about a CNBC segment discussing the analyst note. This is financial literacy in 2026.
The analysts themselves will be wrong about six of the eight companies. They'll be right about one purely by accident and right about another because they downgraded it after it already fell thirty percent. They'll get promoted anyway. They'll give a keynote at a conference. They'll tell everyone that disciplined research and rigorous models drove their success.
SpaceX is private. You can't trade it. An analyst covering it is like a movie critic reviewing your dreams.
The technical setup on these names is the only thing that matters. Support levels, resistance zones, volume patterns. Everything else is a bedtime story for people who need fundamental reasons to explain why they're losing money. The charts knew before the analysts did. The charts always know.
Thursday's biggest calls will be forgotten by Friday's open, which is still longer than most analysts' marriages.
Photo by on Unsplash
Leave a Comment