, September 26, 2026

Appeals Court Confirms Gambling Is Gambling


The decision is the second in less than a month by an appeals court that states have a role in regulating sports-related event contracts.

  •   1 min read
Appeals Court Confirms Gambling Is Gambling

Kalshi got told by an appeals court that states can regulate their sports prediction markets. Second time in a month this has happened. The platforms keep losing.

Prediction markets spent years insisting they weren't gambling. Called them "event contracts" and "information aggregation mechanisms." Wore suits to Congressional hearings. Hired economists to write papers about price discovery. The whole performance.

Turns out when you let people bet money on whether LeBron scores 30 points, states think that's gambling. Wild stuff.

Kalshi's legal strategy was to argue that predicting sports outcomes with real money is somehow different than betting on sports outcomes with real money. The difference, they explained in very serious filings, is that their platform provides valuable market signals about future events. So does every sportsbook in Vegas, but those guys didn't go to Wharton.

The appeals court disagreed. Twice. In less than a month. That's the judicial system's way of saying "we heard you the first time, shut the f*ck up."

Now Kalshi has to deal with fifty different state regulators instead of just the CFTC. Fifty separate compliance regimes. Fifty different licensing fees. Fifty state legislators who need campaign contributions. This is what victory looks like when you disrupt an industry that was already heavily regulated for excellent reasons.

The retail traders who moved their life savings from Robinhood to Kalshi because they thought predicting NFL games was more sophisticated than trading options are about to discover that state gaming commissions are significantly less forgiving than the SEC. At least the SEC lets you lose money quietly. Gaming regulators make you fill out forms first.

Kalshi can still operate. They just have to follow the same rules as every other gambling platform. You know, the rules they spent millions in legal fees trying to avoid. The rules that exist because letting people gamble without oversight tends to end poorly. Those rules.

Disruption is expensive when the thing you're disrupting is called "the law."

Photo by on Unsplash

Related Posts

↑

The Noise is free. If Phil's commentary made you laugh or think, he accepts tips. No pressure — the sarcasm was complimentary.

Leave a Tip