Bank of America announced its third-quarter investment banking fees will drop more than 10%. Shares fell. Analysts are calling this a potential sign that the AI boom is slowing down. Nobody called it a sign that maybe investment banking fees just fluctuate sometimes because that would require acknowledging markets move for reasons other than whatever narrative we invented last week.
The country's second-largest bank by assets just told everyone they'll make slightly less money than expected. This is apparently news. This is apparently worth connecting to artificial intelligence. The leap from "we're collecting fewer fees" to "the entire AI revolution is in trouble" requires the kind of logic only a financial journalist could execute with a straight face.
Retail traders saw the headline and immediately started panic-selling their Nvidia shares while Googling "what are investment banking fees." They still don't know. They won't look it up after this either. They'll just buy whatever Jim Cramer tells them to on Monday and act surprised when that doesn't work out.
Bank of America could have said their fees were up 10% and someone would've written "Surging investment banking revenue signals AI bubble about to pop." The number doesn't matter. The direction doesn't matter. Everything is always either proof the bubble is inflating or proof it's about to burst. Nothing is ever just a f*cking quarterly fluctuation at a bank that does a thousand different things.
The stock dropped because of course it did. Investors heard "slightly less money than we thought" and ran for the exits like someone yelled fire in a theater. These are the same people who will buy back in next quarter when fees are up 3% and the headline says "AI boom back on track."
Investment banking fees go up and down more often than a teenager's self-esteem, but we're pretending this one data point from one bank means the future of computing is doomed.
Photo by on Unsplash
Leave a Comment