Berkshire shares hit their highest level since Warren Buffett announced he'd quit in May 2025. The stock rallied while the broader market sold off. Retail traders immediately began searching for the reason.
There is no reason. The stock went up because more people bought than sold. That's it. That's the whole story. But you can't write that in a headline because editors need to pretend causality exists in markets.
Buffett said he'd step down at the end of 2025. The stock went down. Now it's October 2026 and the stock is higher than it was when he made the announcement. So either the succession worried everyone for no reason, or the succession doesn't worry anyone anymore, or—and stay with me here—the stock price had absolutely nothing to do with the succession in the first place.
Somewhere right now a guy with $847 in his Robinhood account is reading articles about Berkshire's insurance float and trying to figure out if Greg Abel's leadership style correlates with the rally. He's building a thesis. He's checking multiple timeframes. He's about to buy three shares at the top and hold through a fifteen percent drawdown while telling himself it's a long-term value play.
The chart made a higher high. The chart doesn't care who runs the company. The chart doesn't care about the meeting notes or the analyst upgrades or whatever CNBC said this morning. The chart is price over time and price over time just told you it wanted to go up right now, which means it'll probably go down later, which means you'll be wrong no matter when you buy it.
Buffett could announce he's been dead for six months and the stock would gap up three percent on volume.
Photo by Infrarate.com on Unsplash
Leave a Comment