Two economists won a thing for building models that governments use to stabilize economies. The same economies that crash every decade like clockwork. The same models that missed 2008. The same central banks that printed money until inflation ate your grocery budget alive. But sure, let's hand out trophies.
Robert E. Hall and Michael Woodford get the award for work that "underpins" policy models. Underpins. That's the word they went with. Like a foundation. Except foundations don't collapse every time someone sneezes near a regional bank or a hedge fund decides to short housing.
The models stabilize the economy the way a drunk driver stabilizes a car by overcorrecting into both lanes. Rate cuts. Rate hikes. Quantitative easing. Tightening. Forward guidance that changes every six weeks. All built on frameworks these two guys helped create. The frameworks work perfectly until they don't, at which point Jerome Powell shows up with a printer and everyone pretends this was the plan all along.
Retail traders will read this headline and think it means something. They'll Google "monetary policy frameworks" at 2 a.m. They'll watch a YouTube video titled "How Central Banks REALLY Control Markets." They'll buy treasury bonds because clearly the adults are in charge. Then they'll watch their portfolio bleed out during the next "unforeseen" crisis that every model somehow missed.
Hall and Woodford built the intellectual scaffolding for the people who told you inflation was transitory. The same people who said subprime was contained. The same people who swore rate hikes wouldn't break anything right before Silicon Valley Bank went tits-up. These models are so good at stabilizing economies that we need a new acronym for each crisis.
Congratulations to two guys who mathematically justified whatever central banks were going to do anyway.
Leave a Comment