China watched American AI executives beg for regulation and decided the word for that is cowardice. State media called their slowdown plea "fear mongering" at a daily press conference. They added something about openness and inclusivity, which is what you say when you're behind.
The CEOs wanted guardrails. China heard that and thought about how guardrails are what you install when you think you might drive off a cliff. They're not wrong. Sam Altman spent six months telling Congress to please stop him before he kills again, and China watched that performance like it was dinner theater.
Now Beijing wants everyone to work together on AI openness. Openness means "give us your research." Inclusivity means "stop trying to ban our chips." When a government uses both words in one sentence, they're asking you to lose on purpose while they sprint past you.
The American approach was to build the most powerful technology in human history, panic about it, then ask the government to maybe think about possibly forming a committee. China's approach is to build it faster and call you a p*ssy for hesitating. Both strategies assume the technology works, which is generous.
Retail traders saw this headline and immediately wondered if there's an ETF that tracks international AI drama. There is not. They'll buy semiconductor stocks instead, completely unaware that the entire conflict is about who gets to lose money on chatbots first.
The funniest part is China accusing anyone of fear mongering. This is the same country that banned Winnie the Pooh because someone made a meme. But they're technically correct about the CEO slowdown letter, which was less about safety and more about pulling the ladder up behind them.
Fear mongering requires fear. What these executives have is a marketing budget and a Senate hearing schedule.
Photo by on Unsplash
Leave a Comment