Greg Abel dropped $4.5 billion on buybacks in his second quarter running Berkshire. That's the headline. A man in charge of $300 billion in cash spent 1.5% of it and we're calling it a big chunk. Financial journalists measure spending the way your cousin Brad measures his bench press. Generously.
Buffett hoarded cash for years like a depression-era grandmother stockpiling canned beans. Abel shows up and suddenly everyone acts like he invented deployment. He bought back stock. Revolutionary. Next quarter maybe he'll file a 10-Q on time and CNBC will give him a primetime special.
The buybacks signal confidence in Berkshire's value, according to people who need buybacks to signal things because charts don't work. Technical analysts don't need signals. We have support levels. We have RSI. We have the knowledge that none of this headline matters because Berkshire's chart looked exactly the same before Abel spent a dime and it'll look exactly the same after.
Retail traders read "big chunk of cash to work" and immediately check if Berkshire is up pre-market. It's not. It never is based on buyback announcements because the market already priced in the fact that massive companies sometimes buy their own stock. But sure, update your watchlist. Add a rocket emoji. Tell yourself this time the fundamental news will override the fact that you're buying at resistance.
Abel could light $4.5 billion on fire in the parking lot of the Omaha Dairy Queen and the stock would move based on whether it gapped above the 50-day moving average. That's not cynicism. That's just knowing which variable actually matters.
Spending money doesn't make you a visionary. It makes you a CEO with a brokerage account and a board that said yes.
Photo by on Unsplash
Leave a Comment