A judge ordered Todd Blanche and Scott Bessent to submit sworn declarations within a week confirming the DOJ's anti-weaponization fund is dead. Not paused. Not under review. Dead.
The judge wants a guarantee. In writing. Under oath. Because apparently when you tell the government something is cancelled, they treat it like a gym membership and keep billing you anyway.
Blanche is the Acting Attorney General. Bessent runs Treasury. Two men who could probably end this with a phone call now have to write essays promising they really, truly, pinky-swear murdered this fund. The judicial system has become a kindergarten teacher asking if you really flushed.
The fund was called anti-weaponization, which is the kind of name you give something when the branding team has already checked out. Like calling a sandwich "anti-starvation bread" or a car "anti-walking wheels." It screams we had no idea what to call this.
Now a judge is demanding sworn proof it's gone. Not a press release. Not a memo. A declaration that could land them in contempt if they're lying. The legal equivalent of making you look someone in the eye while you apologize.
Retail traders will read this headline and think it's bullish for something. Maybe justice. Maybe accountability. Maybe whatever coin they're holding that's down 87% since February. They'll tell themselves this is the kind of regulatory clarity the market needs, as if a judge forcing two Cabinet members to pinky-swear about a dead fund is the catalyst for their portfolio to stop bleeding.
Blanche and Bessent have seven days. Seven days to write a document confirming they killed a thing that probably never existed in the first place. The legal system treating the executive branch like a teenager who says he cleaned his room but won't let anyone look inside.
The judge wants proof it's dead, which implies someone thought it might still be alive, which means even the court doesn't trust these people to cancel a f*cking fund.
Photo by on Unsplash
Leave a Comment