KFC spent decades serving Pepsi products and has now decided to serve Coke products instead. This required a meeting. Multiple meetings. Someone got promoted for this.
The company that sells fried chicken in a bucket conducted a strategic beverage review and determined that a different brown carbonated sugar water would pair better with their fried chicken in a bucket. The margins are identical. The taste is functionally identical. The decision matters to exactly zero customers who were planning to order a bucket of fried chicken.
Pepsi lost the contract. Their stock will not move. Coke gained the contract. Their stock will not move. KFC announced the switch. Their parent company's stock will not move. But retail traders will absolutely convince themselves this represents actionable intelligence and trade accordingly.
Some guy named Derek is reading this headline right now and opening his Robinhood app. Derek thinks beverage contracts are a leading indicator. Derek thinks KFC switching from Pepsi to Coke tells him something about consumer preferences in the quick-service restaurant sector. Derek is already pulling up a five-year chart of YUM Brands and drawing trendlines with his finger.
The chicken tastes the same. The soda tastes the same. The stock price will do whatever it was going to do anyway. But Derek is convinced he found an edge because he reads financial headlines at 6 AM before his shift at Enterprise Rent-A-Car.
KFC could serve battery acid in a commemorative cup and it would not change a single quarterly earnings projection. They could switch to RC Cola. They could eliminate beverages entirely and force customers to bring their own drinks. None of it would matter because people go to KFC to eat fried chicken and feel regret, not to evaluate beverage partnerships.
Derek just bought calls on Coca-Cola. He's going to lose money and blame the market.
Photo by on Unsplash
Leave a Comment