David Ellison merged two dying entertainment conglomerates and decided the guy who sold Barbies should run the wreckage. Ynon Kreiz spent years convincing parents to buy plastic dolls at markup rates that would make defense contractors blush. Now he gets to convince Wall Street that combining Paramount's debt with Warner Bros. Discovery's debt somehow creates value.
The math here is flawless. Take one company bleeding subscribers. Add another company bleeding subscribers. Announce a co-CEO structure because nothing screams operational efficiency like splitting leadership duties during a corporate merger. Kreiz leaves Mattel right as the toy industry faces its first recession where kids have iPads instead of action figures.
Retail traders will see this headline and think merger arbitrage opportunity. They will open their Robinhood apps and buy calls on both companies. They will calculate synergies using YouTube videos titled "How I Turned $500 Into $50K." They will not read the SEC filings. They will not understand that co-CEO means neither person has actual authority. They will lose money and blame Jerome Powell.
Ellison could have hired anyone. He picked the Mattel guy. Not the Netflix guy. Not the Disney guy. The man whose greatest professional achievement was greenlit a Barbie movie that succeeded despite every decision Mattel ever made. Warner Bros. Discovery already tried the merger synergy playbook. Their stock trades lower than both legacy companies did separately. Paramount's streaming service loses money on every subscriber. The solution is apparently hiring someone whose core competency is injection-molded polyvinyl chloride.
But sure. The toy executive will fix Hollywood. Right after he figures out which building his office is in.
Photo by on Unsplash
Leave a Comment