The United States and a collection of other countries just signed off on open-source AI development with "strong security" at a summit in China. APEC ministers put their names on a statement about cooperation. China's industry minister Li Lecheng called it historic because it mentions open-source at the minister level for the first time. Revolutionary stuff.
Picture the negotiation. American diplomats flew to China to agree that code should be free but also secure. The Chinese nodded. Everyone shook hands. Someone ordered lunch. They released a statement using words like "cooperation" and "security" in the same sentence about artificial intelligence, which is like promising your dog will be both off-leash and obedient.
Open-source AI with strong security is a adorable concept. It's software anyone can access and modify, but don't worry, it's definitely secure. That's the same energy as a screen door on a submarine. The ministers sat in a room and decided the future of machine learning should be transparent and locked down simultaneously. Pick one.
Li Lecheng thinks this ministerial-level open-source talk matters. He's technically correct. Ministers said words they've never said together before at this specific altitude of bureaucracy. Groundbreaking. The code was already open. The security was already a suggestion. But now there's a statement.
Retail traders read this headline and started googling which AI stocks to buy because the governments of the world agreed on something. They'll find three ETFs with "AI" in the name, pick the one with the worst expense ratio, and congratulate themselves for getting in early on a diplomatic communique.
The summit produced a document. The document contains principles. The principles mention security fourteen times and open-source six times. Nobody defined either term because definitions require follow-up questions, and follow-up questions ruin photo opportunities.
Photo by on Unsplash
Leave a Comment