Prediction market traders bet against economist estimates on September jobs numbers. This counts as news because apparently we've decided to treat gambling websites as leading economic indicators.
The over/under exists because some guy in his basement wearing a Patagonia vest thinks his contrarian take on NFP deserves real money behind it. He's fading the consensus. He's zigging when they zag. He's also checking his phone every six minutes until Friday's BLS release while his wife asks why he's been so distant lately.
Economists build models with seasonal adjustments and regression analyses and thirty years of labor market data. Prediction market guy read a thread on Twitter about strong consumer spending and decided that's basically the same thing. He skimmed a chart. He saw a line going up. He clicked buy.
The markets are pricing in higher job growth than the street expects. Which means retail traders pooled their money to disagree with people who do this for a living. They're not hedging a portfolio. They're not managing risk exposure. They're literally just betting they're smarter than economists because they watched a YouTube video about how institutions always get it wrong.
Here's what happens next. Either the number comes in high and prediction market traders spend three months telling everyone they called it, or it comes in low and they pretend they never placed the bet. There is no third option.
The beautiful part is none of this matters. Jobs beat, jobs miss, revisions carve thirty percent off last month's print three weeks later. The market does whatever it was going to do anyway. But sure, let's check what the guys gambling on employment data think about labor force participation rates.
Nothing signals confidence in your economic thesis quite like needing odds to express it.
Photo by Markus Spiske on Unsplash
Leave a Comment