S&P Global Ratings revised Meta's outlook to negative. The reason: capital spending and free cash flow.
Meta is spending so much on AI infrastructure that a credit rating agency flinched. This is an agency that rated mortgage bonds triple-A in 2007. It has seen things. It has caused things.
Mark Zuckerberg heard the news and did what he always does. He ordered more servers.
Free cash flow is the money left after the company pays for its hobbies. Meta's hobby is concrete, GPUs, and electricity. Mark has become a utility company with a social network attached.
Technical analysis has a position on this. The chart goes up and to the right until it goes down and to the left. S&P just drew a small pencil line on the part that says "down." I don't read headlines, but I respect a pencil.
Retail traders will read "negative outlook" and sell. Then they will read "Meta still prints money from ads" and buy back in at a higher price. Then they will post about discipline. They hold positions the way a toddler holds a wet cat.
Fake press release: Meta Platforms regrets to inform shareholders that the money has been converted into buildings. The buildings are very large. The buildings are thinking about you. No refunds.
A negative outlook is not a downgrade. It means S&P might downgrade later, like a dentist saying "we should keep an eye on that." Nobody has ever kept an eye on that.
Meta will be fine. Its ad business is enormous and its credit is still strong. Your portfolio, built entirely from a podcast and a feeling, will not be fine.
Photo by Markus Winkler on Unsplash
Leave a Comment