The Supreme Court decided the Trump administration can resume sending migrants to random third countries they've never lived in. Not their home country. Not a country they've been to. Just whatever country agrees to take them. It's like spinning a wheel except the wheel hates you and you don't get a prize.
The legal term for this is "third-country deportation." The accurate term is "we're sending you somewhere and f*cking good luck." Imagine getting arrested in Ohio and the judge says you're being deported to Cleveland. Except you're from Florida. And you've never been to Cleveland. And also Cleveland is actually Guatemala.
Retail traders heard about this ruling and immediately tried to figure out which airline stocks to buy. They created seventeen Discord channels to discuss the arbitrage opportunity in private prison REITs. One guy posted a 40-slide technical analysis proving that migrant deportation volume correlates with the inverse head-and-shoulders pattern on his ex-wife's alimony payments.
The Supreme Court granted the hold request without hearing oral arguments. They just rubber-stamped it. The highest court in the land looked at "deport people to countries they're not from" and said sure, what could go wrong. The Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution by candlelight so 250 years later nine people in robes could approve international human bingo.
Day traders are already pricing in the geopolitical implications. They're buying calls on confusion. Selling puts on human dignity. Hedging their portfolio with whatever the opposite of compassion is. One guy on Reddit calculated that if you short the concept of due process and go long on bureaucratic nightmares, you can retire by 35.
The administration can now resume a policy where the punishment for seeking asylum is getting dropped off in a country you can't name on a map, don't speak the language of, and have zero connection to. It's not cruel and unusual punishment—it's just unusual.
Photo by on Unsplash
Leave a Comment