India told an arbitration court to go f*ck itself this week after the court ruled it must honor a 1960 water-sharing treaty with Pakistan. The treaty governs rivers flowing between two nations that both possess nuclear weapons. One controls the taps. The other wants the water. An international court said follow the rules. India said no.
This dispute has simmered for decades. Simmered. Like water you're not getting because your neighbor decided the treaty doesn't count anymore. The arbitration ruling adds what the article calls "a new layer of stress" to the relationship, which is diplomatic language for "things that were already bad just got worse between countries that could theoretically end human civilization in South Asia."
Retail traders are currently scanning their brokerage apps wondering if there's a water ETF they can YOLO into. There isn't. Water rights disputes don't trade on the NASDAQ. They just occasionally escalate into regional instability between nuclear powers, but that's not the kind of volatility that comes with a options chain, so it might as well not exist.
The court issued its ruling. India rejected it. Pakistan presumably remains thirsty and angry. The treaty remains unenforceable because international law only works when both parties agree to pretend it works. This is the global equivalent of your neighbor building a fence three feet onto your property and telling you to sue him about it. Except the fence is a dam and the property line is a disputed border and both neighbors have weapons that can vaporize cities.
The most sophisticated geopolitical analysts will tell you water scarcity is the conflict driver of the twenty-first century. The least sophisticated will buy defense contractor stocks and call it hedging. Both groups are watching this story. Neither group can do a single f*cking thing about it.
Treaties are just suggestions with fancier paperwork.
Photo by Zoshua Colah on Unsplash
Leave a Comment