Wolfe Research published a note telling investors to avoid earnings blow-ups. Not last quarter's blow-ups. Future blow-ups. They identified indicators that may herald disappointments at multiple companies.
May herald. That's the language you use when you have no f*cking idea but need to justify the research budget.
The premise assumes three things. First, that these indicators actually predict anything. Second, that you'll correctly interpret them before earnings. Third, that the market hasn't already priced in whatever these magic signals are screaming about.
Retail traders will read this and think they've unlocked the cheat code. They'll scan for the indicators. Find them in four different stocks. Buy puts on all of them. Three will beat earnings. One will miss but still rally because guidance was less apocalyptic than expected. The puts will expire worthless. The trader will then subscribe to a Discord channel run by a teenager in Estonia who claims to have a proprietary algorithm.
Here's what Wolfe Research won't tell you. If the indicators were reliable enough to trade on, institutional money would've already arbitraged them into oblivion. You'd be buying puts at prices that assume a forty percent chance of catastrophic failure when the actual probability is six percent.
The research note exists so portfolio managers can tell their clients they were warned. See, Wolfe called it. We circulated the memo. You can't blame us for holding through the print.
The funniest part? Someone will avoid a stock because of these indicators, watch it rip twenty percent, then buy calls on another name with the exact same signals because this time feels different.
Photo by on Unsplash
Leave a Comment