Saudi Arabia says it intercepted missiles and drones launched by the Houthis. The Houthis say they hit airports and energy sites. Both claims arrived without receipts.
That is the real story. Two parties, two versions, zero audited results.
Compare that to your brokerage app. Same energy. Confident claims, no verification, and a red number you refuse to look at.
The Houthis are Iran-backed. Saudi Arabia is Saudi Arabia. Oil traders are watching Red Sea supply risk and reaching for the buy button like it owes them money.
Here is my technical read. Missile goes up. Missile gets shot down. Chart goes sideways. Nothing happens, loudly, at great expense.
A Saudi interceptor costs more than your car. It is aimed at a drone that costs less than your phone. The drone loses. You still lose more.
Retail traders will now draw a trendline through a war zone. They will call it "geopolitical support." They will buy crude calls at the top because a man on television said "supply risk" in a serious voice.
I have a different approach. I look at the chart, I look at the sky over Riyadh, and I conclude that only one of them is being defended competently.
The Houthis claim airports and energy sites. Saudi Arabia claims interceptions. Somewhere in the middle sits the truth, and it is not telling you where oil closes Friday.
Go ahead and size up. The drones have better risk management than you do.
Photo by on Unsplash
Leave a Comment