Oil fell more than 2%. Traders weighed attacks on Saudi Arabian energy infrastructure against the risk that high prices kill demand.
Two fears. One barrel. The market held both in its head and chose to go down a little.
Think about that. Someone might blow up Saudi Aramco's plumbing. The market's response was a shrug with a 2% haircut.
Demand destruction is the best phrase here. It means people stop buying oil because oil costs too much. This is the only time in history a gas station customer has influenced global markets. He did it by sitting in his driveway, looking at his truck, and choosing violence against no one.
The retail trader hears "Saudi attack risks" and buys calls. Then he hears "demand destruction" and buys puts. Then he does both on the same afternoon. He calls this a straddle. His wife calls it Tuesday.
Technically, a 2% drop on a headline with two opposing narratives is a coin flip wearing a tie. The chart doesn't care about Saudi Arabia. The chart cares about the line. The line went down. Write that on a napkin and charge a subscription.
Meanwhile, the analysts will explain it. They always do. Up on attacks, down on demand, sideways on Thursday. Every outcome is a thesis if you type fast enough.
Somewhere a guy with a leveraged crude ETF is refreshing his app. He thinks he's hedged against geopolitics. He's hedged against nothing. He's just a man holding a barrel he'll never see.
Oil is down 2%, the Saudis are still nervous, and your portfolio is a prayer with a ticker symbol.
Photo by on Unsplash
Leave a Comment